2025年度第11回定例研究会「Game Industry Timeline: How Danish Game Funding and Policy Shapes Today’s Industry」

来る2026年3月27日(金曜日)、立命館大学ゲーム研究センターによる2025年度第11回定例研究会を実施致します。発表者は、Hanna Wirman氏とMark Staun Poulsen氏です。登録・参加料不要となっております。お誘い合わせの上、奮ってご参加のほど、お待ちしております。
The Ritsumeikan Center for Game Studies will hold its 11th workshop of the 2025 academic year on Wednesday, March 27th, 2026. The presenter will be Hanna Wirman and Mark Staun Poulsen. Registration is not required, and there is no participation fee. We look forward to your active participation.

■発表タイトル Title
Game Industry Timeline: How Danish Game Funding and Policy Shapes Today’s Industry

■発表者 Presenter
Hanna Wirman
Mark Staun Poulsen
IT University of Copenhagen (Denmark), Center for Digital Play

■日時 Date and Time
3月27日 (金曜日) 16:30~18:30
March 27th (Fri) 16:30~18:30

■場所 Venue
立命館大学衣笠キャンパス 学而館研究会室 3 アクセス
Ritsumeikan Kinugasa Campas, Gakujikan Reserch Room 3 Access

■概要 Summary
In 2022, the European Union prioritized strengthening the cultural and creative dimensions of the video game sector as a key action point for 2023–2026. In 2025, Denmark launched Europe’s first dedicated institute for game development under its Ministry of Culture, focused on supporting original Danish games. Together, these reflect how European and Scandinavian game industries cultivate unique national frameworks, political traditions, and industrial communities that enable diverse production cultures – supported by art funding, professional education, and grassroots movements. In this presentation, PhD researcher Mark Staun Poulsen and Prof. Hanna Wirman share progress on creating and updating the first timeline of Danish game industry conditions. They document formative policies, entities, and support structures, illustrating how these have shaped local environments for commerce, education, and artistry over the past 25 years, culminating in recent institutionalization. Drawing from this chronology, the authors trace overlapping, and at times conflicting, public programs and private interests driving professionalization, while reflecting on the method’s limitations for uncovering industry data, politics, and history.